Pattern-Oriented LLM Context Management

In cooperation with GenAI, we propose a pattern language for managing, diagnosing, and repairing context in large language model (LLM) systems. Inspired by memory dump analysis, it reframes conversational state—token windows, KV-caches, retrievals, and transcripts—as observable artifacts that can be read, segmented, and reasoned about.

1. Conceptual Alignment

Memory dump analysis: we have a frozen system state (heap, stack, registers, handles). You need structured ways (patterns) to interpret what happened and where anomalies lie.

LLM context management: we have a dynamic, limited-window context (tokens in the prompt + generated continuation). We need structured strategies to maintain coherence, recall, and relevance across long or shifting interactions.

So, both are about:

  • State representation
  • Navigation across levels of abstraction
  • Pattern recognition to interpret meaning

2. Pattern Families Reapplied to LLMs

Using the memory dump analysis taxonomy, we can draw analogies:

Structural patterns (e.g., "Stack Trace", "Heap Graph")
Context trace: The sequence of tokens, messages, or embeddings.
Analog: analyzing token “call stacks” to identify where topic drift began.

Temporal patterns (e.g., "Periodicity", "Error Burst")
Context lifecycle: Recognizing conversation cycles (e.g., Q → A → refinement).
Analog: "periodic error" becomes recurring hallucination in long-form dialogue.

Anomaly patterns (e.g., "Corruption", "Dangling Pointer")
Context corruption: Where injected noise or forgotten details lead to contradictions.
Analog: dangling reference = the model invents details not grounded in earlier context.

Diagnostic trajectory patterns (navigating from symptom to root cause)
Prompt engineering trajectory: iterative refinement of instructions to steer model back on track.

3. Higher-Order Mappings

Context window ≈ address space
Tokens in the active window = accessible memory; past truncated context = paged-out memory.

Embeddings ≈ symbolic heap objects
External vector memory is like mapped heap regions that can be dereferenced on demand.

Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) ≈ dump analysis with external symbol servers
Just as debuggers resolve addresses via symbol servers, RAG resolves context gaps via external knowledge.

Chain-of-Thought ≈ call stack
Each reasoning step corresponds to a frame in a diagnostic stack trace.

4. Pattern Language as Meta-Framework

Memory dump analysis pattern language gives a meta-taxonomy for LLM context management research:

  • Failure patterns (e.g., hallucination loops, context bleed, token starvation).
  • Navigational patterns (re-establishing grounding when context is partially lost).
  • Architectural patterns (multi-agent context partitioning, like multi-process memory spaces).

This creates a portable, semiotic map of context phenomena across LLM frameworks.

5. Possible Research / Practical Outputs

LLM Context Forensics: Classify anomalies using memory dump patterns using dump-like snapshots of LLM state (KV-caches, attention matrices, prompt logs).

Context Debugger: An Interactive tool where you can “walk the stack” of a conversation, identify dangling references, or detect periodic error hallucinations.

Pattern Language Extension: Extend diagnostic patterns with LLM-specific categories (e.g., Prompt Poisoning, Embedding Drift, Attention Collapse).

Memory dump analysis pattern language is highly portable to LLM context management. It can serve as a meta-diagnostic and design language for classifying, predicting, and repairing LLM context failures, much like it systematized memory dump interpretation.

Source: ChatGPT 5 conversation